| |
Re: Pyramid Dates
Posted By: Senusret In Response To: Pyramid Dates (Charles Pope)
Date: Friday, 20 January 2006, at 8:47 a.m.
SEE I dont mind 100 years at all but 1000! thats too high is all im saying I dont think the discrepency of the pyramid dating affects the armana period is basically what i am porporting.
- CAT Scan of King Tut
Charles Pope -- Monday, 29 August 2005, at 3:57 p.m.- Fetuses in Tut's Tomb
Charles Pope -- Friday, 2 September 2005, at 2:39 p.m.- "Who Killed Tut: Case Reopened"
Charles Pope -- Monday, 26 December 2005, at 8:39 a.m.- Re: "Who Killed Tut: Case Reopened"
Eddie Larry -- Monday, 16 January 2006, at 6:33 p.m.- Tut and Carbon Dating
Charles Pope -- Monday, 16 January 2006, at 11:16 p.m.- Re: Tut and Carbon Dating
Eddie Larry -- Wednesday, 18 January 2006, at 6:00 p.m.- Elisha's Bones of Contention
Charles Pope -- Wednesday, 18 January 2006, at 6:39 p.m.- Re: Elisha's Bones of Contention
Senusret -- Thursday, 19 January 2006, at 8:36 a.m.- Pyramid Dates
Charles Pope -- Thursday, 19 January 2006, at 4:08 p.m.- Re: Pyramid Dates
Senusret -- Friday, 20 January 2006, at 8:47 a.m.- Re: Pyramid Dates
Charles Pope -- Friday, 20 January 2006, at 9:01 a.m.
- Re: Pyramid Dates
- Re: Pyramid Dates
- Pyramid Dates
- Re: Elisha's Bones of Contention
- Elisha's Bones of Contention
- Re: Tut and Carbon Dating
- Tut and Carbon Dating
- Re: "Who Killed Tut: Case Reopened"
- "Who Killed Tut: Case Reopened"
- Fetuses in Tut's Tomb
| |
© Charles N. Pope, US Library of Congress. All rights reserved.
