I would like to offer some more in-depth commentary, but I'd like you to clarify two things first:
A) Didn't you originally propose Aristobulus VI as the main model for historical Jesus? Why the shift to Ari III?
B) With Aristobulus III, doesn't that throw off the timelines of NT Gospels (eg. Ari III a century or more earlier?)
Any insight appreciated,
Responses To This Message
© Charles N. Pope, US Library of Congress. All rights reserved.