In reply
Your answer that Lugalzaggesi as KING of WORLD and can be king of WHATEVER? logic means we can call him King of Kish :King of Ur etc
This would be misleading and confusing to non experts -like me
Surely if a king belongs within a dynasty ie Lugalzaggesi is 3rd URUK
It can't be correct to call him Lugalzaggesi of UMMA he must be called
Lugalzaggesi of URUK
projecting your logic we should/could identify Hammurabi of Babylon
as Hammurabi of Larsa

Regards gh

Responses To This Message

Lugalzaggesi (for sheezi)